From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 4, 2006
917 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 4D05-4293.

January 4, 2006.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Dan Vaughn, Judge; L.T. Case No. 00-98 CFA.

Valenta Johnson, Milton, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


Affirmed. Issues of sentencing procedure are not cognizable in a Rule 3.800(a) motion. See, e.g., Wright v. State, 911 So.2d 81 (Fla. 2005).

STEVENSON, C.J., WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Johnson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 4, 2006
917 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Johnson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Valenta JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 4, 2006

Citations

917 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Yarger v. State

Affirmed. See Steward v. State, 931 So.2d 133 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Ives v. State, 993 So.2d 117 (Fla. 4th DCA…

Yaist v. State

Affirmed. See Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045 (Fla. 2011); Adaway v. State, 902 So.2d 746 (Fla. 2005); Rusaw…