From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
Jan 21, 2021
957 N.W.2d 13 (Iowa Ct. App. 2021)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

finding it unnecessary to address the amendment's applicability because application was time-barred under either the prior or new version of the statute

Summary of this case from Matthews v. State
See 3 Summaries

Opinion

No. 19-1949

01-21-2021

Johnny Lee JOHNSON, Applicant-Appellant, v. STATE of Iowa, Respondent-Appellee.

Cathleen J. Siebrecht of Siebrecht Law Firm, Des Moines, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Darrel Mullins, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee State.

DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION See Iowa R. App. P. 6.904

AFFIRMED.

Summaries of

Johnson v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
Jan 21, 2021
957 N.W.2d 13 (Iowa Ct. App. 2021)

finding it unnecessary to address the amendment's applicability because application was time-barred under either the prior or new version of the statute

Summary of this case from Matthews v. State

finding it unnecessary to address the amendment's applicability because application was time-barred under either the prior or new version of the statute

Summary of this case from Greenup v. State

noting "[t]his amendment appears to abrogate Allison"

Summary of this case from Ali v. State
Case details for

Johnson v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHNNY LEE JOHNSON, Applicant-Appellant, v. STATE OF IOWA…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

Date published: Jan 21, 2021

Citations

957 N.W.2d 13 (Iowa Ct. App. 2021)

Citing Cases

Velazquez-Ramirez v. State

"Since Allison , our court has had several opportunities to consider the phrase ‘filed promptly.’ " Johnson…

Tolbert v. State

However, "we have repeatedly concluded that delays of one year or more are not sufficiently prompt." Johnson…

16 Citing Cases