From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Stanfill Drywall Service

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 18, 1982
414 So. 2d 24 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. AF-379.

May 18, 1982.

Appeal from the Deputy Commissioner.

Thomas F. Woods of Woods, Johnston, Carlson Sanford, Tallahassee, for appellant.

L. Lee Williams, Jr. of Peeples, Earl, Moore Blank, P.A., Tallahassee, for appellees.


This workers' compensation claimant appeals the deputy commissioner's denial of his claim for temporary total disability benefits. There is no medical testimony that the claimant was unable to work as a result of his accident, and there is no evidence that he sought work during the period for which he seeks temporary disability benefits. This Court has repeatedly held that the requirement that a claimant test his disability in the job market is not obviated by testimony from the claimant that he finds it painful to work. Tallahassee Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. Parramore, 395 So.2d 275 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981) and Mahler v. Lauderdale Lakes National Bank, 322 So.2d 507 (Fla. 1975). We accordingly AFFIRM.

MILLS, LARRY G. SMITH and SHAW, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Stanfill Drywall Service

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 18, 1982
414 So. 2d 24 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Johnson v. Stanfill Drywall Service

Case Details

Full title:J.T. JOHNSON, APPELLANT, v. STANFILL DRYWALL SERVICE, AND TRAVELERS…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: May 18, 1982

Citations

414 So. 2d 24 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Structural Forming, Inc. v. Mas

However, pain alone does not necessarily indicate a loss of wage-earning capacity, nor is it an excuse for…