Opinion
Submitted October 27, 1933 —
Decided January 5, 1934.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam opinion is printed in 11 N.J. Mis. R. 677.
For the appellants, Judson B. Salisbury.
For the respondents, Huckin Huckin.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.