From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Meyer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1934
242 App. Div. 798 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

October, 1934.


Order granting plaintiffs' motion for judgment on the pleadings and judgment entered thereon affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Sections 1077-a, 1077-b and 1083-b of the Civil Practice Act do not prevent the plaintiffs from bringing suit for interest accrued on the mortgage and for taxes they have paid on the property at the request of the mortgagor. Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., concurs for affirmance of order granting judgment for plaintiffs on the pleadings as to the item of taxes, but dissents from that part of the order granting judgment as to the item of interest, and votes to reverse the order and judgment in that respect.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Meyer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1934
242 App. Div. 798 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

Johnson v. Meyer

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES JOHNSON and Another, Respondents, v. WILLIAM MEYER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1934

Citations

242 App. Div. 798 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Citing Cases

Central Hanover Bank T. Co. v. Roslyn Estates

Respondent contends that under the moratory statutes a mortgagee may sue in one action — pleading separate…

White v. Wielandt

It has been held that, despite the moratorium statutes (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 1077-b, 1083-b), the mortgagee may…