From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Leach Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 29, 2004
5 A.D.3d 735 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-00578.

Decided March 29, 2004.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries and wrongful death, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Emerson, J.), dated December 9, 2002, which granted the motion of the defendant third-party plaintiff, Leach Company, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and granted the motion of the third-party defendant Mack Trucks, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Kenneth R. Torti, New York, N.Y., for appellants.

James D. Butler, P.A., New York, N.Y. (Paul A. Liggio of counsel), for defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent.

Maimone Associates, PLLC, Mineola, N.Y. (Leland N. Garbus and Thomas J. Maimone of counsel), for third-party defendant-respondent Mack Trucks, Inc.

Charles G. Eichinger, Islandia, N.Y. (Denise K. O'Rourke of counsel), for third-party defendant Taurus Waste Disposal, Inc.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal from so much of the order as granted the motion of the third-party defendant Mack Trucks, Inc., is dismissed, as the plaintiff is not aggrieved by that portion of the order ( see CPLR 5511); and it is further

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondents.

The defendant third-party plaintiff, Leach Company (hereinafter Leach), made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that any finding as to proximate cause would be based on mere speculation ( see Mazzone v. Lazaroff, 305 A.D.2d 558, 559; Johnson v. Sniffen, 265 A.D.2d 304; Scheer v. City of New York, 211 A.D.2d 778). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact ( see generally Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted Leach's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ALTMAN, J.P., S. MILLER, KRAUSMAN and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Leach Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 29, 2004
5 A.D.3d 735 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Johnson v. Leach Company

Case Details

Full title:SUSAN LYNN JOHNSON, ETC., ET AL., appellants, v. LEACH COMPANY, defendant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 29, 2004

Citations

5 A.D.3d 735 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
773 N.Y.S.2d 598

Citing Cases

Corrado v. Vath

On the day of the accident and prior to her fall, the infant plaintiff had gone over the ramps several times…

Benitez v. Olson

The appeal by the plaintiff must be dismissed as he is not aggrieved by the order ( see CPLR 5511; Gwyn v.…