From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Kemna

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Jun 29, 2006
451 F.3d 938 (8th Cir. 2006)

Summary

holding that post-conviction proceedings in Missouri are not final until issuance of the mandate

Summary of this case from Gibson v. Dormire

Opinion

No. 05-1041.

Submitted: June 13, 2006.

Filed: June 29, 2006.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.

Kevin L. Schriener, argued, Clayton, Missouri, for appellant.

Ronald S. Ribaudo, argued, Jefferson City, Missouri, for appellee.

Before SMITH, HEANEY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.


Raymond Johnson appeals the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The district court dismissed Johnson's petition as untimely filed, finding that it was filed over one month past the deadline imposed by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act ("AEDPA"), 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1).

AEDPA requires a state prisoner seeking federal habeas corpus relief to file his federal petition within one year after his state conviction becomes final. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). However, this limitations period does not include the time during which a properly filed application for state post-conviction review is "pending" in state courts. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2). The recent decision of this court in Payne v. Kemna, 441 F.3d 570 (8th Cir. 2006), which both parties agree is controlling in this matter, instructs that an application for state post-conviction review, under Missouri law, is pending until the mandate is issued. 441 F.3d at 572. When that date is taken into consideration, there is no dispute that Johnson's petition for a writ of habeas corpus was timely filed before the district court. Accordingly, the district court's judgment dismissing Johnson's habeas petition as untimely is reversed, and this case is remanded for further proceedings. See 8th Cir. R. 47(b).

Considering the 19 days that elapsed between when Johnson's state conviction became final, June 20, 1998, and the date he initiated post-conviction relief proceedings in state court, July 9, 1998, only 358 days passed between the issuance of the mandate on June 2, 2003, and his filing of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in federal district court on May 5, 2004, thus making his petition timely filed.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Kemna

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Jun 29, 2006
451 F.3d 938 (8th Cir. 2006)

holding that post-conviction proceedings in Missouri are not final until issuance of the mandate

Summary of this case from Gibson v. Dormire

holding that post-conviction proceedings in Missouri are not final until issuance of the mandate

Summary of this case from BUFF v. PURKETT
Case details for

Johnson v. Kemna

Case Details

Full title:Raymond JOHNSON, Appellant, v. Michael KEMNA, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Jun 29, 2006

Citations

451 F.3d 938 (8th Cir. 2006)

Citing Cases

Wilkinson v. Dooley

" Id. State collateral or post-conviction proceedings "are 'pending' for the period between the trial court's…

Whitecalf v. Young

" Id. State collateral or post-conviction proceedings "are 'pending' for the period between the trial court's…