From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Haig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 1996
226 A.D.2d 588 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 22, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion to vacate the order dated January 31, 1994, is granted, that order is vacated, and the complaint is reinstated.

The order dismissing the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3126 (3) was improperly based on an ex parte oral motion made by the defendant without giving notice to the plaintiff. We note, however, that this determination is made without prejudice to the defendant's renewal of the motion in accordance herewith. Miller, J.P., Joy, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Haig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 1996
226 A.D.2d 588 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Johnson v. Haig

Case Details

Full title:FRANCES JOHNSON, Appellant, v. ARMEN C. HAIG, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 22, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 588 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
641 N.Y.S.2d 571

Citing Cases

Fraracci v. Lasouska

We reverse. From a procedural standpoint, insofar as plaintiff sought to strike the answer based on…