From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 22, 2003
305 A.D.2d 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

92675

May 22, 2003.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Anthony Johnson, Marcy, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Andrea Oser of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Peters, Spain and, Carpinello, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting smuggling, possession of a controlled substance and refusing to obey a direct order after he was observed, following a visit from his mother, attempting to swallow an object that was later identified as a balloon containing two packets of heroin. Substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt was presented at his disciplinary hearing in the form of the misbehavior report, the NIK test results that were positive for the presence of heroin and the testimony of the two correction officers who subdued petitioner and confiscated the contraband drugs (see Matter of Pizarro v. Goord, 278 A.D.2d 718, 718; Matter of Zarvela v. Goord, 270 A.D.2d 532, 533, lv denied 95 N.Y.2d 758). We reject petitioner's claim that the audiotape used to record the last part of his hearing was inaudible, thereby precluding meaningful review. The record discloses that the tape was completely audible, enabling an uninterrupted transcription of the proceedings (see Matter of Wilson v. Coombe, 237 A.D.2d 831, 832). The remaining contentions raised herein, including petitioner's assertions that various procedural errors deprived him of a fair hearing, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

This is the second tier III disciplinary hearing to be held on these charges. The decision from the first hearing, conducted approximately two months earlier, was administratively reversed and expunged from petitioner's institutional record. A new hearing was ordered resulting in the determination under review.

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 22, 2003
305 A.D.2d 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Johnson v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF ANTHONY JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 22, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
758 N.Y.S.2d 864

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Johnson v. Goord

amaging state property, the second misbehavior report, which was read into the record at the hearing, set…