From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Eckle

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Jun 17, 1959
269 F.2d 836 (6th Cir. 1959)

Opinion

No. 13757.

June 17, 1959.

John M. Johnson, in pro. per., for appellant.

William Saxbe and Walter M. Shea, Columbus, Ohio, for appellee.

Before MARTIN, Chief Judge, McALLISTER, Circuit Judge, and CECIL, District Judge.


This is an appeal from the order of the District Court dismissing appellant's petition for a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that it was moot. Appellant had been sentenced to the Ohio Penitentiary on an indeterminate sentence of from one to fifteen years, for the offense of theft. After his petition for a writ of habeas corpus was filed, and before hearing of the petition, appellant was released from incarceration, on parole. He is not in the custody of appellee, Eckle, Superintendent of the London Prison Farm. With the release of appellant from incarceration and custody, the case became moot.

Where, after commencement of a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner was released on parole, and was no longer in the custody of the warden, the proceeding is dismissed as moot. United States ex rel. St. John v. Cummings, 2 Cir., 233 F.2d 187. See also Weber v. Squier, 315 U.S. 810, 62 S.Ct. 800, 86 L.Ed. 1209; Ex parte Baez, 177 U.S. 378, 20 S.Ct. 673, 44 L.Ed. 813; Wales v. Whitney, 114 U.S. 564, 5 S.Ct. 1050, 29 L.Ed. 277.

The order of the District Court is affirmed.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Eckle

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Jun 17, 1959
269 F.2d 836 (6th Cir. 1959)
Case details for

Johnson v. Eckle

Case Details

Full title:John M. JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. R.B. ECKLE, Superintendent…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Jun 17, 1959

Citations

269 F.2d 836 (6th Cir. 1959)

Citing Cases

United States v. Brilliant

Hence we do not think the appeal can be dismissed as moot. United States ex rel. Bradford v. Thompson, 2…

Jones v. Cunningham

In each, as in Pollard, the custody requirement was unmentioned. United States ex rel. St. John v. Cummings,…