From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. City of Jacksonville

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A
Feb 5, 1946
24 So. 2d 717 (Fla. 1946)

Opinion

February 5, 1946

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County, Bayard B. Shields, Judge.

Evan T. Evans, for appellant.

William M. Madison and O.O. McCollum, Jr., for appellee.


This was a suit for damages caused by personal injuries resulting from one of the plaintiffs driving an automobile into a hole which had recently occurred in a paved street of the City of Jacksonville and which hole was caused by the washing out of the foundation from under the pavement.

At the close of plaintiff's testimony, defendant moved for a directed verdict and upon the court intimating that the motion would be granted, the plaintiff took non-suit with bill of exceptions.

Without applying the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur plaintiff's evidence was insufficient to establish liability of defendant.

The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur does not apply to this case. See 25 Am. Juris. pages 853, 854.

There is nothing in the evidence to show that the defendant either knew, or should with reasonable diligence have known, of the alleged defect in the street.

The judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

CHAPMAN, C. J., TERRELL and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Johnson v. City of Jacksonville

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A
Feb 5, 1946
24 So. 2d 717 (Fla. 1946)
Case details for

Johnson v. City of Jacksonville

Case Details

Full title:EDNA M. JOHNSON, joined by her husband, L. M. JOHNSON, v. CITY OF…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida. Division A

Date published: Feb 5, 1946

Citations

24 So. 2d 717 (Fla. 1946)
24 So. 2d 717

Citing Cases

Tamiami Trail Tours v. Locke

An examination of the metamorphosis of res ipsa loquitur in Florida reveals that the formula established by…

Lisk v. City of West Palm Beach

Unless, therefore, the alleged condition complained of was so open and obvious and had existed for such a…