Summary
explaining that pretrial detainee seeking preliminary and permanent injunctions of his state criminal proceedings, dismissal of his state charges, and immediate release failed to advance a cognizable claim under § 1983 because his sole remedy was to file a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Summary of this case from Richard v. Richmond Cnty. Superior CourtOpinion
CASE NO. CV409-143.
October 28, 2009
ORDER
Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. (Doc. 3.) After a careful review of the record, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the Court's Opinion in this case. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE THIS CASE.
SO ORDERED.