From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Kansas
May 9, 2008
ACTION No. 03-1195 MLB (D. Kan. May. 9, 2008)

Summary

finding that a seven-month delay between the Commissioner's fully favorable decision awarding disability insurance benefits to the plaintiff and the plaintiff's counsel's motion was "somewhat long, but counsel justifies the delay"

Summary of this case from Sinkler v. Berryhill

Opinion

ACTION No. 03-1195 MLB.

May 9, 2008


ORDER


Ten days having passed, and no written objections being filed to the proposed findings and recommendations filed by the magistrate judge John Thomas Reid, and after a de novo determination upon the record pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 72(b), the court accepts the recommended decision and adopts it as its own.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Kansas
May 9, 2008
ACTION No. 03-1195 MLB (D. Kan. May. 9, 2008)

finding that a seven-month delay between the Commissioner's fully favorable decision awarding disability insurance benefits to the plaintiff and the plaintiff's counsel's motion was "somewhat long, but counsel justifies the delay"

Summary of this case from Sinkler v. Berryhill
Case details for

Johnson v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:MARILYN H. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: May 9, 2008

Citations

ACTION No. 03-1195 MLB (D. Kan. May. 9, 2008)

Citing Cases

Sinkler v. Berryhill

Other courts seem to acknowledge that delays of up to six or seven months' time amount to lengthy periods of…

Schmidt v. Colvin

Id. On appeal, the 10 Circuit held that the district court decision was not arbitrary, capricious, whimsical,…