From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jun 6, 2012
Case No. 6:11 CV 00044-TC (D. Or. Jun. 6, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 6:11 CV 00044-TC

06-06-2012

RENAE E. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Defendant.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on April 25,2012. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Sc Co., Ltd., 700 F,2d 1202,1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist, 708 F.2d 452,454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation.

______________________

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Johnson v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jun 6, 2012
Case No. 6:11 CV 00044-TC (D. Or. Jun. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Johnson v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:RENAE E. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jun 6, 2012

Citations

Case No. 6:11 CV 00044-TC (D. Or. Jun. 6, 2012)

Citing Cases

Madrid v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

(D. Or. Apr. 25, 2012) (“The Commissioner, however, does not dispute that the ALJ wholly failed to address…