From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Ann-Gur Realty Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 13, 2014
117 A.D.3d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-05-13

Kim JOHNSON, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. ANN–GUR REALTY CORPORATION, Defendant–Appellant, El Saboreo Deli Grocery LLC, Defendant.

White, Fleischner & Fino, LLP, New York (Jason Steinberg of counsel), for appellant. Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & De Cicco, LLP, New York (Brian J. Isaac of counsel), for respondent.



White, Fleischner & Fino, LLP, New York (Jason Steinberg of counsel), for appellant. Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & De Cicco, LLP, New York (Brian J. Isaac of counsel), for respondent.
TOM, J.P., ACOSTA, MOSKOWITZ, GISCHE, CLARK, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Sharon A.M. Aarons, J.), entered September 16, 2013, which denied the motion of defendant Ann–Gur Realty Corporation (Ann–Gur) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Ann–Gur failed to establish its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law in this action where plaintiff was injured when he allegedly tripped and fell after stepping in a defect in the sidewalk that abutted premises owned by Ann–Gur. The record presents triable issues as to whether Ann–Gur's negligence in failing to maintain the subject sidewalk in a safe condition was a proximate cause of plaintiff's accident. Ann–Gur presented evidence supporting two proximate causes of the accident, including plaintiff's testimony that he tripped on a hole in the sidewalk, and the report of Ann–Gur's medical expert opining that plaintiff was intoxicated at the time of his fall and that that was likely the cause of his fall. Under these circumstances, resolution of the issue of whether and to what extent plaintiff's condition contributed to his accident is a question of fact ( see Ruiz v. 30 Real Estate Corp., 47 A.D.3d 432, 849 N.Y.S.2d 238 [1st Dept.2008];compare McNally v. Sabban, 32 A.D.3d 340, 820 N.Y.S.2d 260 [1st Dept.2006] ). Similarly, any inconsistencies in plaintiff's testimony present credibility issues for a trier of fact ( see e.g. Hagensen v. Ferro, Kuba, Mangano, Skylar, Gacovino & Lake, PC, 108 A.D.3d 410, 411, 969 N.Y.S.2d 34 [1st Dept.2013] ).


Summaries of

Johnson v. Ann-Gur Realty Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 13, 2014
117 A.D.3d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Johnson v. Ann-Gur Realty Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Kim JOHNSON, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. ANN–GUR REALTY CORPORATION…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 13, 2014

Citations

117 A.D.3d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
117 A.D.3d 522
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 3451

Citing Cases

Chan Juan Zheng v. Mak

However, upon renewal, the court adheres to Justice Gische's March 14, 2012 order. The inconsistencies in…

Serrano v. Brook Plaza, LLC

Any inconsistencies in plaintiff's testimony raised only issues of fact and credibility, which are not…