From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Adamick

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Jan 12, 2006
No. 09-05-004 CV (Tex. App. Jan. 12, 2006)

Opinion

No. 09-05-004 CV

Opinion Delivered January 12, 2006.

On Appeal from the 221st District Court, Montgomery County, Texas, Trial Cause No. 04-07-05628-CV.

Appeal Dismissed.

Before McKEITHEN, C.J., KREGER and HORTON, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


R. Wayne Johnson filed notice of appeal from the dismissal of his suit against Barbara Adamick and filed a motion for indigent status on appeal. The trial court sustained the clerk's and court reporter's contest to the appellant's motion for indigent status and ordered Johnson to pay appellate costs. Tex.R.App.P. 20.1(k). On October 13, 2005, we held the appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs as ordered by the trial court, and provided notice that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution thirty days from the date of the order unless the appellant paid the filing fee and provided proof of payment arrangements for preparation of the appellate record. Tex.R.App.P. 37.3. R. Wayne Johnson has not remitted the filing fee, nor has he submitted evidence that he has arranged for preparation of the clerk's record and the reporter's record. Failure to file the clerk's record because the appellant failed to pay for the record is grounds for dismissal for want of prosecution. Tex.R.App.P. 37.3(b). The appellant failed to timely comply with our order of October 13, 2005. Tex.R.App.P. 42.3(c). The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Tex.R.App.P. 42.3(b), (c).


Summaries of

Johnson v. Adamick

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Jan 12, 2006
No. 09-05-004 CV (Tex. App. Jan. 12, 2006)
Case details for

Johnson v. Adamick

Case Details

Full title:R. WAYNE JOHNSON, Appellant, v. BARBARA ADAMICK, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Jan 12, 2006

Citations

No. 09-05-004 CV (Tex. App. Jan. 12, 2006)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. Harrison

80. In re Johnson, NO. 09–05–032–CV, COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS, NINTH DISTRICT, BEAUMONT, 2005 Tex.App. LEXIS…