From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johns v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 30, 2016
CASE NO. 15cv1556 DMS (NLS) (S.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2016)

Summary

In Johns v. Montgomery (265 Ill. 21), where the trust deed required the retention of the land and its operation for agricultural purposes, the court recognized its duty and that of the trustee to protect the estate.

Summary of this case from Matter of Pulitzer

Opinion

CASE NO. 15cv1556 DMS (NLS)

08-30-2016

GERRY JOHNS, Petitioner, v. W.L. MONTGOMERY, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER (1) ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND (2) GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

On July 9, 2015, Petitioner Gerry Johns ("Petitioner"), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On October 5, 2015, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition on the grounds it is a second or successive petition and also untimely. On March 16, 2016, Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), recommending that the Court grant Respondent's motion to dismiss. Petitioner filed objections to the R&R on March 29, 2016.

This Court, having reviewed de novo the Magistrate Judge's R&R and Petitioner's objections thereto adopts the R&R in its entirety. Respondent's motion to dismiss is granted. The Court finds no basis for a certificate of appealability. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly, and terminate this case. DATED: August 30, 2016

/s/_________

HON. DANA M. SABRAW

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Johns v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 30, 2016
CASE NO. 15cv1556 DMS (NLS) (S.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2016)

In Johns v. Montgomery (265 Ill. 21), where the trust deed required the retention of the land and its operation for agricultural purposes, the court recognized its duty and that of the trustee to protect the estate.

Summary of this case from Matter of Pulitzer

In Johns v. Montgomery (265 Ill. 21) it is held that a court of equity has jurisdiction to modify the terms of a trust when unforeseen conditions have arisen which require such modification, in order to protect the trust estate.

Summary of this case from New York State Railways v. Security Trust Co.
Case details for

Johns v. Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:GERRY JOHNS, Petitioner, v. W.L. MONTGOMERY, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 30, 2016

Citations

CASE NO. 15cv1556 DMS (NLS) (S.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2016)

Citing Cases

Low v. First Nat. Bk. Tr. Co.

A court of equity has jurisdiction to enter a decree modifying the terms of the trust when the facts…

Dyer v. Paddock

That a court of equity has power to modify a trust under certain conditions is well established by the cases.…