From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

John Treiber Agency v. Spartan Concrete Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 24, 2000
268 A.D.2d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted November 17, 1999

January 24, 2000

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Feuerstein, J.), entered January 21, 1999, which granted those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were for summary judgment on the issue of liability only and to dismiss the defendant's counterclaims and strike its affirmative defenses.

Alan Kraut (Spiros A. Tsimbinos, Kew Gardens, N.Y., of counsel), for appellant.

John G. Aicher, Jr., Garden City, N.Y., for respondent.

WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is modified by deleting the provisions thereof granting those branches of the motion which were for summary judgment (a) on the issue of liability, and (b) striking the first and second affirmative defenses and dismissing the first counterclaim, and substituting therefor provisions denying those branches of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the defendant.

Where the terms of an oral agreement between disputing parties are at issue, a trial is the only remedy (see, Werfel v. Zivnostenska Banka, 287 N.Y. 91 ; L.N.L. Constr. v. M.T.F. Indus., 190 A.D.2d 714 ). Moreover, where, as here, the issues of liability and damages are inextricably intertwined, it is best to leave the entire claim for trial (see, Matter of Kovacik, 67 A.D.2d 625, 626 ; Pathmark Graphics v. J.M. Fields, Inc., 53 A.D.2d 531, 532 ; Harold Ohringer, Inc. v. Kass, 28 A.D.2d 1117 ).

The defendant's second counterclaim and third affirmative defense relate to the defendant's claim that the plaintiff negligently failed to obtain the lowest possible insurance rates. Since this claim is merely a restatement of the separate counterclaim to recover damages for breach of contract, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the second counterclaim and properly struck the third affirmative defense (see, New York Univ. v. Continental Ins. Co., 87 N.Y.2d 308, 316 ).

THOMPSON, J.P., S. MILLER, KRAUSMAN, FLORIO, and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

John Treiber Agency v. Spartan Concrete Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 24, 2000
268 A.D.2d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

John Treiber Agency v. Spartan Concrete Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN TREIBER AGENCY, Inc., respondent, v. SPARTAN CONCRETE CORP., appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 24, 2000

Citations

268 A.D.2d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
701 N.Y.S.2d 666

Citing Cases

Thompson v. Horwitz

The Supreme Court erred, however, in granting that branch of the plaintiff's cross motion which was for…

Singh v. Benzina, Inc.

The plaintiff thus raised triable issues of fact as to whether his part performance rendered the parties'…