From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

John Doe v. Town of W. Hartford

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 8, 2016
151 A.3d 384 (Conn. 2016)

Opinion

11-08-2016

John DOE v. TOWN OF WEST HARTFORD et al.

Scott M. Karsten, Michael R. McPherson and Laura Pascale Zaino, in support of the petition. Josephine Smalls Miller, in opposition.


Scott M. Karsten, Michael R. McPherson and Laura Pascale Zaino, in support of the petition.

Josephine Smalls Miller, in opposition.

The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 168 Conn.App. 354, 147 A.3d 1083 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court's grant of the defendants' motion for summary judgment on the basis of its determination that a genuine issue of material fact existed with respect to the availability of the savings statute, General Statutes § 52–593a ?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that § 52–593a is available to save a cause of action despite the failure of the serving officer to endorse on the officer's return the date of delivery of the process to such officer pursuant to § 52–593a(b) ?"


Summaries of

John Doe v. Town of W. Hartford

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 8, 2016
151 A.3d 384 (Conn. 2016)
Case details for

John Doe v. Town of W. Hartford

Case Details

Full title:John DOE v. TOWN OF WEST HARTFORD et al.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Nov 8, 2016

Citations

151 A.3d 384 (Conn. 2016)
323 Conn. 936

Citing Cases

Doe v. Town of W. Hartford

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that § 52–593a is available to save a cause of action despite…