J & J Sports Prods. Inc. v. Los Toritos Bar Rest. Inc.

Full title: J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS INC., Plaintiff, v. LOS TORITOS BAR RESTAURANT…

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Oct 24, 2017

15-CV-6517 (SJ) (ST) (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2017)

Opinion

15-CV-6517 (SJ) (ST)

10-24-2017

J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS INC., Plaintiff, v. LOS TORITOS BAR RESTAURANT INC., ADELAIDA PACHECO, and NELSON A. PACHECO, Defendants.

APPEARANCES PAUL J. HOOTEN & ASSOCIATES 5505 Nesconset Highway Suite 203 Mt. Sinai, NY 11766 By: Paul J. Hooten Attorneys for Plaintiff

JOHNSON, Senior District Judge

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

APPEARANCES PAUL J. HOOTEN & ASSOCIATES
5505 Nesconset Highway
Suite 203
Mt. Sinai, NY 11766
By: Paul J. Hooten
Attorneys for Plaintiff JOHNSON, Senior District Judge:

Presently before the Court is a Report and Recommendation ("Report") prepared by Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione. Judge Tiscione issued the Report on September 11, 2017, and provided the parties with the requisite amount of time to file any objections. Neither party filed any objections to the Report. For the reasons stated herein, this Court affirms and adopts the Report in its entirety.

A district court judge may designate a magistrate judge to hear and determine certain motions pending before the Court and to submit to the Court proposed findings of fact and a recommendation as to the disposition of the motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within 10 days of service of the recommendation, any party may file written objections to the magistrate's report. See id. Upon de novo review of those portions of the record to which objections were made, the district court judge may affirm or reject the recommendations. See id. The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the report and recommendation to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). In addition, failure to file timely objections may waive the right to appeal this Court's Order. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Small v. Sec'y of Health and Human Servs., 892 F.2d 15, 16 (2d Cir. 1989).

In this case, objections to Magistrate Judge Tiscione's recommendations were due on September 25, 2017. No objections to the Report were filed with this Court. Upon review of the recommendations, this Court adopts and affirms Magistrate Judge Tiscione's Report in its entirety. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. Dated:October 24, 2017

Brooklyn, NY

/s/_________

Sterling Johnson, Jr., U.S.D.J.