From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

J.H. v. Dept. of Children Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 5, 2006
924 So. 2d 965 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 4D05-3430.

April 5, 2006.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County, John B. Bowman, J.

Kathleen K. Pena of Law Offices of Kathleen K. Pena, Pembroke Pines, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Tricia D. Brissett, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


We reverse the order of the trial court which closed this dependency case by placing the dependent child in the care and custody of her paternal aunt and not the appellant father, but noted that "protective supervision is terminated, pending therapeutic recommendation — case is closed over father's objection." First, the child had not been in the aunt's custody for the required six months pursuant to section 39.622(9), Florida Statutes. Therefore, the court could not terminate protective supervision when it did. Second, it does not appear that the order in fact terminated protective supervision, because it was only terminated "pending therapeutic recommendation." Because there was not yet a therapeutic recommendation, the condition to terminating supervision had not been established, and the court erred in closing the case. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

J.H. v. Dept. of Children Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 5, 2006
924 So. 2d 965 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

J.H. v. Dept. of Children Families

Case Details

Full title:J.H., the Father, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN FAMILIES, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 5, 2006

Citations

924 So. 2d 965 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

I.Z. v. Department of Child

In determining whether the trial court erred in placing the child in a permanent guardianship and in…