From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jewell v. Director

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Nov 16, 1964
204 A.2d 564 (Md. 1964)

Opinion

[App. No. 62, September Term, 1964.]

Decided November 16, 1964.

From a finding that he was a defective delinquent, James E. Jewell applied for leave to appeal.

Application denied.

Before HENDERSON, C.J., and HAMMOND, HORNEY, SYBERT and OPPENHEIMER, JJ.


This is the third time that the applicant has been found to be a defective delinquent, but the first time he has applied for leave to appeal. The record contains evidence to support the determination of defective delinquency. It is well settled that the testimony of Dr. Boslow is admissible, although based in part upon the medical findings of others. Dickerson v. Director, 235 Md. 668.

Application denied.


Summaries of

Jewell v. Director

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Nov 16, 1964
204 A.2d 564 (Md. 1964)
Case details for

Jewell v. Director

Case Details

Full title:JEWELL v . DIRECTOR OF PATUXENT INSTITUTION

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Nov 16, 1964

Citations

204 A.2d 564 (Md. 1964)
204 A.2d 564

Citing Cases

Oppel v. Director

Dr. Boslow's testimony was admissible, even though based in part upon the medical findings of others. Jewell…

Hirons v. Director

In this application for leave to appeal from a determination of defective delinquency, the applicant raises…