From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

J.E.W. v. Estate of Doe

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 20, 1985
481 So. 2d 921 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. AZ-448.

November 21, 1984. Rehearing Denied August 20, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County, John A. Rudd, J.

John A. Barley Associates, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Claire A. Duchemin of Young, van Assenderp, Varnadoe Benton, Tallahassee, and David G. Budd of Van Koughnet and Budd, Naples, for appellee.


AFFIRMED.

SMITH, ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.


ON MOTION FOR REHEARING


The motion for rehearing is DENIED. State Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. West, 378 So.2d 1220 (Fla. 1979) is distinguishable from this case. In West the state was concerned with support of the minor child during the life of the father. The state's interest in securing support payments for the minor child is greater than avoiding stale claims. The instant case is one for declaratory judgment of paternity with no benefits sought or other relief claimed. It is a pure paternity action and barred by section 95.11(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1981). The appellant cannot seek support from the estate of his deceased father. Flagler v. Flagler, 94 So.2d 592 (Fla. 1957). Flagler is a clear statement of the law and this court is obligated to follow that precedent.

SMITH, ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

J.E.W. v. Estate of Doe

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 20, 1985
481 So. 2d 921 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

J.E.W. v. Estate of Doe

Case Details

Full title:J.E.W., APPELLANT, v. ESTATE OF JOHN DOE, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Aug 20, 1985

Citations

481 So. 2d 921 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

In re Estate of Smith

The court pointed out that the limitations period prescribed by section 95.11 (3)(b) already had run by the…