From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jepsen v. Camassar

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 13, 2018
329 Conn. 909 (Conn. 2018)

Opinion

06-13-2018

Anders B. JEPSEN et al. v. Beth M. CAMASSAR et al.

Beth A. Steele, Norwich, in support of the petition. Mark S. Zamarka, New London, in opposition.


The petition of the plaintiffs Anders B. Jepsen and Beth Jepsen for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 181 Conn.App. 492, ___ A.3d ___ (2018), is denied.


Summaries of

Jepsen v. Camassar

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 13, 2018
329 Conn. 909 (Conn. 2018)
Case details for

Jepsen v. Camassar

Case Details

Full title:Anders B. JEPSEN et al. v. Beth M. CAMASSAR et al.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Jun 13, 2018

Citations

329 Conn. 909 (Conn. 2018)
186 A.3d 12

Citing Cases

Jepsen v. Camassar

ALVORD, J. The plaintiffs Anders B. Jepsen and Beth Jepsen appeal from the denial of their postjudgment…

Freidheim v. McLaughlin

(Emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted.) Jepsen v. Camassar , 181 Conn. App. 492, 517, 187 A.3d…