From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jenkins v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 14, 1999
262 A.D.2d 455 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted May 5, 1999

June 14, 1999

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant New York City Transit Authority appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated June 19, 1998, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and the cross claim insofar as asserted against it.

Wallace D. Gossett, New York, N.Y. (Steven S. Efron and Renee L. Cyr of counsel), for appellant.

GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., FRED T. SANTUCCI, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiff Earnestine Jenkins was injured when she slipped and fell on snow and/or ice while exiting a bus operated by the appellant. A common carrier owes a duty to an exiting passenger to stop at a place where the passenger may safely disembark and leave the area ( see, Miller v. Fernan, 73 N.Y.2d 844, 846; Kelleher v. F.M.E. Auto Leasing Corp., 192 A.D.2d 581, 584; Blye v. Manhattan Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 124 A.D.2d 106, 109, affd 72 N.Y.2d 888). There is an issue of fact as to whether the appellant breached this duty.


Summaries of

Jenkins v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 14, 1999
262 A.D.2d 455 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Jenkins v. New York City Transit Authority

Case Details

Full title:EARNESTINE JENKINS, et al., plaintiffs-respondents, v. NEW YORK CITY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 14, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 455 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
692 N.Y.S.2d 99

Citing Cases

Garcia-Martinez v. City of New York

None of the other co-defendants oppose MABSTOA's and NYCTA's motion. Plaintiff opposes MABSTOA's and NYCTA's…

Patterson v. N.Y.C. Transit Auth

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable by the respondents. It is well settled…