From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jefferson v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia. Chesapeake
May 8, 2001
35 Va. App. 436 (Va. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

Record No. 0953-99-2. Circuit Court Nos. 98-1136-F and 98-1076-F through 98-1078-F.

May 8, 2001.

Douglas A. Ramseur (D. Gregory Carr; Bowen, Bryant, Champlin Carr, on briefs), Richmond, for appellant.

Leah A. Darron, Assistant Attorney General (Mark L. Earley, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

Before FITZPATRICK, C.J., BENTON, WILLIS, ELDER, BRAY, ANNUNZIATA, BUMGARDNER, FRANK, HUMPHREYS, CLEMENTS and AGEE, JJ.


UPON A REHEARING EN BANC

By opinion dated August 22, 2000, a divided panel of this Court affirmed the judgment of the trial court. See Jefferson v. Commonwealth, 33 Va. App. 230, 532 S.E.2d 899 (2000). We granted rehearing en banc and stayed the mandate of that decision.

Upon rehearing en banc, the stay of this Court's August 22, 2000 mandate is lifted, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the majority panel decision.

Judges BENTON, ELDER and ANNUNZIATA concur in part and dissent in part for the reasons set forth in the panel concurrence and dissent.

ORDER

It is ordered that the trial court allow the court-appointed attorneys for the appellant an additional fee of $200 for services rendered the appellant on the rehearing portion of this appeal, in addition to counsel's costs and necessary direct out-of-pocket expenses. This amount shall be added to the costs due the Commonwealth in the August 22, 2000 mandate.

This order shall be published and certified to the trial court.


Summaries of

Jefferson v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia. Chesapeake
May 8, 2001
35 Va. App. 436 (Va. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Jefferson v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:CORY ALVER JEFFERSON, APPELLANT, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, APPELLEE

Court:Court of Appeals of Virginia. Chesapeake

Date published: May 8, 2001

Citations

35 Va. App. 436 (Va. Ct. App. 2001)
545 S.E.2d 585

Citing Cases

Walker v. Commonwealth

We consistently have applied the "single prosecution" rule to recidivist statutes that impose higher…

Totten v. Commonwealth

To the contrary, we have consistently applied this principle in cases decided both before and after Batts.…