From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jarrett v. Ford Motor Credit Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 19, 1986
344 S.E.2d 440 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

71730.

DECIDED MARCH 19, 1986. REHEARING DENIED APRIL 3, 1986.

Action on contract. Clayton State Court. Before Judge Benefield.

William H. Turner, Jr., for appellant.

Daniel F. Bridgers, for appellees.


Ford Motor Credit Company (Ford Motor) brought this action against Gary Jarrett seeking $1,482.18, the alleged balance due on a lease contract. Jarrett filed a direct appeal from the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Ford Motor for $1,482.18 principal plus $173.22 attorney fees.

"`"It is not only the right but the duty of a reviewing or appellate court to raise the question of its jurisdiction in all cases in which there may be any doubt as to the existence of such jurisdiction." [Cit.]' [Cit.]" Atlantic-Canadian Corp. v. Hammer c. Assoc., 167 Ga. App. 257 (1) ( 306 S.E.2d 22) (1983). Although OCGA § 9-11-56 (h) provides that "[a]n order granting summary judgment on any issue or as to any party shall be subject to review by appeal," this statute does not provide for direct appeals from all grants of summary judgment, but must be read in conjunction with OCGA §§ 5-6-34 and 5-6-35 regarding the procedure for appeal to this court. See Hawes v. Dinkler, 224 Ga. 785, 789 (2) ( 164 S.E.2d 799) (1968). Effective July 1, 1984, applications for discretionary appeals are required in "[a]ppeals in all actions for damages in which the judgment is $2,500.00 or less." OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6). This statute unambiguously refers to "judgments" in general and we therefore construe it to be applicable to judgments in the amount of $2,500 or less obtained by verdict following a bench or jury trial as well as by summary judgment. See generally Irwin v. Busbee, 241 Ga. 567 ( 247 S.E.2d 103) (1978). Thus, because the appellant failed to follow the provisions required by OCGA § 5-6-35 (b) for cases in which an application for appeal is required, this direct appeal must be dismissed. Simpkins v. Minks, 175 Ga. App. 729 ( 334 S.E.2d 340) (1985). See also Brown v. Assoc. Fin. Svcs. Corp., 255 Ga. 457 ( 339 S.E.2d 590) (1986).

Appeal dismissed. Banke, C. J., and Birdsong, P. J., concur.

DECIDED MARCH 19, 1986 — REHEARING DENIED APRIL 3, 1986.


Summaries of

Jarrett v. Ford Motor Credit Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 19, 1986
344 S.E.2d 440 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Jarrett v. Ford Motor Credit Company

Case Details

Full title:JARRETT v. FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Mar 19, 1986

Citations

344 S.E.2d 440 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986)
344 S.E.2d 440

Citing Cases

Bullock v. Sand

Although OCGA § 9-11-56(h) provides that "[a]n order granting summary judgment on any issue or as to any…

Superior Ins. Co. v. Browne

50 summary judgment in favor of appellee. Jarrett v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 178 Ga. App. 600 ( 344 S.E.2d…