From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Janson v. Reithoffer Shows, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 1, 2023
No. 21-2374 (4th Cir. Jun. 1, 2023)

Opinion

21-2374

06-01-2023

CHARLENE JANSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. REITHOFFER SHOWS, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

David A. Skomba, Miranda D. Russell, FRANKLIN &PROKOPIK, P.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Michael J. Winkelman, MCCARTHY, WINKELMAN, MESTER, OFFUTT, LLP, Lanham, Maryland, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: October 5, 2022

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah Lynn Boardman, District Judge. (1:19-cv-00079-DLB)

ON BRIEF:

David A. Skomba, Miranda D. Russell, FRANKLIN &PROKOPIK, P.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant.

Michael J. Winkelman, MCCARTHY, WINKELMAN, MESTER, OFFUTT, LLP, Lanham, Maryland, for Appellee.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Before WYNN, DIAZ, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reithoffer Shows, Inc. appeals the district court's denial of its Rule 50 motions for judgment as a matter of law. The jury found that Reithoffer's negligence proximately caused Charlene Janson's injury. And although the jury also found Janson was contributorily negligent, it awarded her damages, finding that Reithoffer had the last clear chance to avoid her injury but failed to do so. Before the case was submitted to the jury, Reithoffer argued that there was insufficient evidence to submit the questions whether Reithoffer's negligence proximately caused Janson's injury and whether Reithoffer had the last clear chance to avoid the injury. After the district court entered judgment, Reithoffer renewed its motion on last-clear-chance grounds. The district court denied those motions.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, for the reasons identified in the district court's decision, see Janson v. Reithoffer Shows, Inc., No. DLB-19-79, 2021 WL 5280894 (D. Md. Nov. 12, 2021), we affirm. And we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conclusions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Janson v. Reithoffer Shows, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 1, 2023
No. 21-2374 (4th Cir. Jun. 1, 2023)
Case details for

Janson v. Reithoffer Shows, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CHARLENE JANSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. REITHOFFER SHOWS, INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 1, 2023

Citations

No. 21-2374 (4th Cir. Jun. 1, 2023)