From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Janos v. Samstag

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jun 1, 1900
31 Misc. 790 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)

Opinion

June, 1900.

Rose Putzel, for appellants.

J. Callahan, for respondents.


There is neither allegation nor proof with respect to the residence of the defendants.

As the jurisdiction of the court depends upon the residence of the defendants within the territorial limits of the city of New York, as now constituted, and as such jurisdiction must affirmatively appear upon the record, it follows that the judgment herein must be reversed. Tyroler v. Gummersbach, 28 Misc. 151.

As, however, the question was first raised on appeal, no costs will be awarded in directing a new trial. Willis v. Parker, 30 Misc. 750; 62 N.Y.S. 1078.

Present: BEEKMAN, P.J., GIEGERICH and O'GORMAN, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, without costs.


Summaries of

Janos v. Samstag

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jun 1, 1900
31 Misc. 790 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)
Case details for

Janos v. Samstag

Case Details

Full title:JACOB JANOS et al., Respondents, v . HENRY F. SAMSTAG et al., Appellants

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Jun 1, 1900

Citations

31 Misc. 790 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)