From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Janke v. Janke

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 29, 1976
39 N.Y.2d 786 (N.Y. 1976)

Summary

affirming for the reasons stated by the Appellate Division

Summary of this case from Alcatec LLC v. Jones Grp. of Miss. LLC

Opinion

Argued March 31, 1976

Decided April 29, 1976

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, FRANK J. KRONENBERG, J.

Bernard J. Sax and Vincent D. Cardone for appellant.

Phillip A. Thielman for respondent.


MEMORANDUM. We affirm for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice HARRY D. GOLDMAN at the Appellate Division. To the large extent that the controversy between these parties turns on questions of fact, the affirmed findings below place these issues beyond the scope of our review. To the extent that issues of law are presented we perceive no error in the determinations of the Appellate Division.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and FUCHSBERG concur; Judge COOKE dissents and votes to reverse on the dissenting opinion by Mr. Justice RICHARD D. SIMONS at the Appellate Division ( 47 A.D.2d 445, 452).

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Janke v. Janke

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 29, 1976
39 N.Y.2d 786 (N.Y. 1976)

affirming for the reasons stated by the Appellate Division

Summary of this case from Alcatec LLC v. Jones Grp. of Miss. LLC
Case details for

Janke v. Janke

Case Details

Full title:IRENE R. JANKE, Respondent, v. WILLIAM F. JANKE, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 29, 1976

Citations

39 N.Y.2d 786 (N.Y. 1976)
385 N.Y.S.2d 286
350 N.E.2d 617

Citing Cases

Saff v. Saff

She appeals from so much of the judgment as denied her alimony and failed to impose a constructive trust on…

In Matter of Romano

With respect to the question of whether the rent was in arrears prior to the date of the decedent's death,…