From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jangana v. Nicole Equities LLC

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 9, 2015
127 A.D.3d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

14783 304027/11

04-09-2015

Sulayman Jangana, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Nicole Equities LLC, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

Havkins Rosenfeld Ritzert & Varriale, LLP, White Plains (Lois Kim of counsel), for appellants. Edelman, Krasin & Jaye, PLLC, Carle Place (Allen J. Rosner of counsel), for respondent.


, Mazzarelli, Saxe, Manzanet-Daniels, Clark, JJ.

Havkins Rosenfeld Ritzert & Varriale, LLP, White Plains (Lois Kim of counsel), for appellants.

Edelman, Krasin & Jaye, PLLC, Carle Place (Allen J. Rosner of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Sharon A.M. Aarons, J.), entered January 13, 2014, which denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment was properly denied in this action where plaintiff alleges that he was injured when, while making a delivery to a tenant in defendants' building, he tripped over mislaid or raised carpeting on the staircase of the building. The evidence demonstrates that triable issues exist as to whether defendants had constructive notice of the defective condition. Plaintiff testified that he noticed the condition of the carpet when making deliveries to the premises on prior occasions. In addition, defendants' own expert stated that the carpet in question would move three-eighths of an inch upon an application of 25 pounds of horizontal force. Contrary to defendants' contention that any defect in the carpet was trivial, whether a defective condition, here, the movement of the carpet, exists so as to create liability depends on "the peculiar facts and circumstances of each case and is generally a question of fact for the jury" (Trincere v County of Suffolk , 90 NY2d 976, 977 [1997] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see also Nin v Bernard , 257 AD2d 417 [1st Dept 1999]).

We have considered defendants' remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: APRIL 9, 2015

DEPUTY CLERK


Summaries of

Jangana v. Nicole Equities LLC

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 9, 2015
127 A.D.3d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Jangana v. Nicole Equities LLC

Case Details

Full title:Sulayman Jangana, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Nicole Equities LLC, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 9, 2015

Citations

127 A.D.3d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 3043
8 N.Y.S.3d 46

Citing Cases

Schreer v. Kips Bay Dev. Ltd.

As shown by the Court in Hutchinson, a court's decision on these issues must be fact specific and based on…

Gillot v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.

It should be noted that defendants do not appear to challenge the description of the condition simply as a…