From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Wells Fargo Bank

United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division
Feb 17, 2011
Case No. 2:10-CV-89 TS (D. Utah Feb. 17, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:10-CV-89 TS.

February 17, 2011


MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. AND MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS


This matter is before the Court on a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo") and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. ("MERS"). The Motion was filed on December 20, 2010. Plaintiffs have not responded to the Motion.

Local Rule 7-1(d) permits the Court to grant a motion based on a failure to respond. Having reviewed the merits of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, the Court finds that it is well-taken and will be granted. It is therefore

DUCivR 7-1(d) ("Failure to respond timely to a motion may result in the court's granting the motion without further notice.")

ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 7) is GRANTED.

DATED February 17, 2011.


Summaries of

James v. Wells Fargo Bank

United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division
Feb 17, 2011
Case No. 2:10-CV-89 TS (D. Utah Feb. 17, 2011)
Case details for

James v. Wells Fargo Bank

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD PROBYN JAMES III, an individual, and SUSAN CAY JAMES, an…

Court:United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division

Date published: Feb 17, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:10-CV-89 TS (D. Utah Feb. 17, 2011)

Citing Cases

Brockbank v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

The Trial Plan, however, expressly notified Susan Brockbank that loan modification was a two step process and…