Opinion
A22A0309
10-06-2021
EDGERRIN TYREE JAMES v. CARLOS NEAL et al.
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
Carlos Neal and Tony Wyzzard ("the plaintiffs") filed suit against Edgerrin Tyree James seeking to hold him personally liable for a judgment. The trial court granted the plaintiffs' motion for default judgment. James filed a motion to open default under OCGA § 9-11-55 and to have the judgment set aside. On July 13, 2021, the trial court denied the motion, finding that, because judgment had been entered, James was not entitled to open default. To the extent James sought to set aside the judgment under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d), the trial court denied the motion. James has filed a notice of appeal from this ruling, but the appeal has not yet been transmitted to this Court.
The plaintiffs filed a motion for a supersedeas bond. On August 3, 2021, the trial court granted the motion and ordered James either to pay funds into the registry of the court or to post a surety bond. James filed a notice of appeal from the order, which is the subject of the instant appeal. For reasons that follow, we find this appeal moot.
As noted by the trial court, it entered default judgment against James. Thus, James was not entitled to open default under OCGA § 9-11-55 (b). Construing James's motion according to its substance rather than its nomenclature, James sought to have the default judgment set aside. See Kuriatnyk v. Kuriatnyk, 286 Ga. 589, 590 (690 S.E.2d 397) (2010) (in pleadings, substance controls over nomenclature). An appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d) must be taken by application for discretionary review. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8); Jim Ellis Atlanta, Inc. v. Adamson, 283 Ga.App. 116 (640 S.E.2d 688) (2006).
"Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional." Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga.App. 257, 257 (471 S.E.2d 60) (1996). James's failure to follow the required appellate procedure deprives us of jurisdiction to consider the propriety of the trial court's July 13, 2021, order.
Because James has no right to appeal the underlying judgment, the appeal of the supersedeas bond is moot. See Dubarton Enterprises, LLC v. Appalachian Community Bank, 321 Ga.App. 755, 755-756 (750 S.E.2d 682) (2013) (without an underlying appeal, issues pertaining to a supersedeas bond are moot). When the questions presented on appeal have become moot, the appeal is subject to dismissal. See OCGA § 5-6-48 (b) (3). Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.