From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Mills

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Dec 27, 2010
Civ. No. 10-202-CL (D. Or. Dec. 27, 2010)

Opinion

Civ. No. 10-202-CL.

December 27, 2010


OPINION AND ORDER


Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983). I conclude that the R and R is correct.

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#20) is adopted. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice (#17) is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter an order staying this proceeding and setting a case status check one year from the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 27 day of December, 2010.


Summaries of

James v. Mills

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Dec 27, 2010
Civ. No. 10-202-CL (D. Or. Dec. 27, 2010)
Case details for

James v. Mills

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN LAMONT JAMES, Petitioner, v. DON MILLS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Dec 27, 2010

Citations

Civ. No. 10-202-CL (D. Or. Dec. 27, 2010)

Citing Cases

Walker v. Howton

However, ORS 138.050 limits the circumstances under which a defendant may appeal when he has pleaded guilty.…