From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Mason

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION SECTION "P"
Oct 9, 2013
CIVIL ACTION 1:10-CV-01706 (W.D. La. Oct. 9, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 1:10-CV-01706

2013-10-09

CALVIN JAMES, Plaintiff v. CURTIS MASON, et al., Defendants


JUDGE JAMES T. TRIMBLE

MAGISTRATE JUDGE JAMES D. KIRK


JUDGMENT

For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, noting the absence of objections thereto, and concurring with the Magistrate Judge's findings under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that the United States' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 70) is GRANTED and James' action against the United States is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

THUS ORDERED AND SIGNED in Chambers at _________, Louisiana, on this 9th day of October 2013.

_________________

JAMES T. TRIMBLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

James v. Mason

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION SECTION "P"
Oct 9, 2013
CIVIL ACTION 1:10-CV-01706 (W.D. La. Oct. 9, 2013)
Case details for

James v. Mason

Case Details

Full title:CALVIN JAMES, Plaintiff v. CURTIS MASON, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION SECTION "P"

Date published: Oct 9, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 1:10-CV-01706 (W.D. La. Oct. 9, 2013)

Citing Cases

Queen v. United States

BOP employees are considered law enforcement officers for purposes of Section 2680(h). See James v. Mason,…