From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Marshall

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Oct 14, 2008
CV 06-3399-CAS(E) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2008)

Opinion


GUY BENJAMIN JAMES, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 06-3399-CAS(E) United States District Court, C.D. California. October 14, 2008

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CHRISTINA A. SNYDER, District Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The Court approves and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition is conditionally granted. Respondent shall discharge Petitioner from all adverse consequences of the judgment in Superior Court action No. KA057663, unless Petitioner is brought to retrial within ninety (90) days of the entry of Judgment herein, plus any additional delay authorized under State law.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein by United States mail on Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

James v. Marshall

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Oct 14, 2008
CV 06-3399-CAS(E) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2008)
Case details for

James v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:GUY BENJAMIN JAMES, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Oct 14, 2008

Citations

CV 06-3399-CAS(E) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2008)

Citing Cases

Marshall v. State

Courts have given varied interpretations to the ongoing emergency language in Davis Hammon. See, e.g., Colon…