From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. James

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 10, 1989
542 So. 2d 486 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-2566.

May 10, 1989.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court for Broward County; Eugene S. Garrett, Judge.

Russell S. Bohn of Edna L. Caruso, P.A., West Palm Beach, S. Robert Zimmerman, P.A., Pompano Beach, and Marvin M. Mitchelson, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.

Gary S. Maisel and H.T. Maloney of Patterson, Maloney Gardiner, Fort Lauderdale, for respondent.


The petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari which would preclude the necessity of providing additional discovery in a dissolution proceeding involving a dispute over alimony, child support and custody. We grant the petition and reinstate the trial judge's original order of August 8, 1988, which denied the motion to file the additional interrogatories.

We are of the opinion that the interrogatories in question constitute an "unfettered fishing expedition . . . [which] will simply encourage the return of the fault concept to dissolution proceedings with all of its attendant atrocities." Smith v. Bloom, 506 So.2d 1173, 1177 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). See also Slatnick v. Leadership Housing Systems of Florida, 368 So.2d 78 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).

CERTIORARI GRANTED.

STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

James v. James

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 10, 1989
542 So. 2d 486 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

James v. James

Case Details

Full title:ADELIA L. JAMES, PETITIONER, v. GORDON JAMES, III, RESPONDENT

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 10, 1989

Citations

542 So. 2d 486 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)