From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Fulkerth

Supreme Court of California
Aug 27, 1885
7 P. 768 (Cal. 1885)

Opinion

         Commissioners' decision.

         Department 2. Appeal from superior court, Stanislaus county.

          SYLLABUS

         FRAUDULENT SALE OF CHATTELS--CHANGE OF POSSESSION.

         A sale of chattels not accompanied by an immediate delivery, and actual and continued change of possession, is void as against creditors, and the chattels, the subject of the sale, may be seized on process by the shcrift.

         T. A. Caldwell, for appellant.

         Louttit & Lindley, for respondent.


         FOOTE, C., We concur: BELCHER, C. C.; SEARLS, C.

          OPINION

          FOOTE, C.

         Action of claim and delivery for a herd of cattle. There was no conflict of evidence in the case; and it does not appear from it that there was such an immediate delivery and actual and continuous change of possession of the property in controversy, from the vendor to the vendees, as will satisfy the provisions of section 3440, Civil Code. The custody of the herd of cattle remained in the same person after as before the sale, and before they were seized in this, action by the sheriff they had not been removed from the land of the vendor, where they were grazing when sold. We are therefore of opinion that the judgment and order of the court below should be affirmed.

         We concur: BELCHER, C. C.; SEARLS, C.

         BY THE COURT.

         For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the judgment and order are affirmed.


Summaries of

James v. Fulkerth

Supreme Court of California
Aug 27, 1885
7 P. 768 (Cal. 1885)
Case details for

James v. Fulkerth

Case Details

Full title:JAMES and another v. FULKERTH

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Aug 27, 1885

Citations

7 P. 768 (Cal. 1885)

Citing Cases

Hedges v. Superior Court

An injunction had been issued and served restraining a corporation, its officers, agents, superintendents,…