From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Ball

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION
Dec 5, 2012
CASE NO. 2:11CV00161 BSM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 5, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:11CV00161 BSM

12-05-2012

DONNIE B. JAMES ADC #089050 PLAINTIFF v. DR. DON BALL, Correctional Medical Services, Inc., et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections have been reviewed. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 48] is granted.
2. All of James's claims against defendants Stell and Corizon, Inc. are dismissed without prejudice.
3. James's claim that defendants Butler and Ball provided him with inadequate medical care for tinnitus is dismissed without prejudice.
4. James's claims that defendants Butler and Ball provided him with inadequate medical care for his port-a-cath and neck/peripheral pain are dismissed with prejudice.
5. It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this order and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith.

An appropriate judgment will accompany this order.

______________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

James v. Ball

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION
Dec 5, 2012
CASE NO. 2:11CV00161 BSM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 5, 2012)
Case details for

James v. Ball

Case Details

Full title:DONNIE B. JAMES ADC #089050 PLAINTIFF v. DR. DON BALL, Correctional…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 5, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 2:11CV00161 BSM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 5, 2012)