From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James Radcliffe Sons Co. v. Knoble

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 5, 1933
163 A. 665 (N.J. 1933)

Opinion

Decided January 5th, 1933.

On appeal from an order of the court of chancery.

Mr. James N. Wright and Messrs. Stickel Stickel, for the respondents.

Frances Hart, for the appellants.


The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, and reported in 109 N.J. Eq. 309, sub nom. James Radcliffe, c., Sons Co. v. Borough of Hawthorne. For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, BROGAN, HEHER, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 16.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

James Radcliffe Sons Co. v. Knoble

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 5, 1933
163 A. 665 (N.J. 1933)
Case details for

James Radcliffe Sons Co. v. Knoble

Case Details

Full title:JAMES RADCLIFFE SONS COMPANY et al., respondents, v. CHARLES E. KNOBLE…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 5, 1933

Citations

163 A. 665 (N.J. 1933)
163 A. 665

Citing Cases

Hiller Skoglund, Inc. v. Atlantic Creosoting Co., Inc.

There remains the question of whether Atlantic's lien claim should be disallowed in toto because it was filed…