From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jaked v. Torncello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 10, 1994
201 A.D.2d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

February 10, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County (Hughes, J.).


Given the proof presented at trial, we find no reason to disturb the finding that plaintiff Margaret A. Jaked sustained a permanent consequential limitation of use of her neck and/or right shoulder as a result of a car accident involving defendant. As to the issue of damages, we rule that, in light of the conflicting testimony and disputed issues of fact relating to the extent and permanency of Jaked's injuries, the jury's award of $5,000 in present damages and $5,000 in future damages did not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation under the circumstances. We also conclude from the proof that the jury's failure to award Jaked's husband damages for loss of services was not improper.

Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, Crew III and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Jaked v. Torncello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 10, 1994
201 A.D.2d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Jaked v. Torncello

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET A. JAKED et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. MARIA TORNCELLO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 10, 1994

Citations

201 A.D.2d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
609 N.Y.S.2d 682

Citing Cases

Teller v. Anzano

The jury, therefore, could have reasonably found that the injuries that plaintiff sustained in the vehicular…

Miller v. Reynolds

Melinda M. Miller (plaintiff) injured her left shoulder in an automobile accident, and plaintiffs commenced…