From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jacques v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 2004
7 A.D.3d 576 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-07182.

Decided May 10, 2004.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (M. Garson, J.), dated July 16, 2003, which granted the defendants' motion pursuant to CPLR 3124 to compel discovery.

John J. Appell, New York, N.Y. (Louis A. Badolato of counsel), for appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Larry A. Sonnenshein and Grace Goodman of counsel), for respondents.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

There was no demonstration of unusual or unanticipated circumstances to warrant discovery after the note of issue had been filed ( see 22 NYCRR 202.21[d]; Audiovox Corp. v. Benyamini, 265 A.D.2d 135). Therefore, the Supreme Court should have denied the defendants' motion pursuant to CPLR 3124 to compel discovery.

SANTUCCI, J.P., SMITH, LUCIANO and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jacques v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 2004
7 A.D.3d 576 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Jacques v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:MARIE JACQUES, appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL., respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 10, 2004

Citations

7 A.D.3d 576 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
775 N.Y.S.2d 897

Citing Cases

Viera v. Lexington Leasing Co.

In the instant application, counsel for Settel states that "[w]e have just come to learn that [Nicole Cobo]…

Reiser v. Town of Smithtown

Plaintiff also argues that information concerning the removal of a tree adjacent to the subject sidewalk is…