From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. White

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jan 31, 2020
Civil No. 19-2332 (JRT/KMM) (D. Minn. Jan. 31, 2020)

Opinion

Civil No. 19-2332 (JRT/KMM)

01-31-2020

DANA D. JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. JUDGE MAXINE WHITE, et al, Defendants.

Dana D Jackson, General Delivery, Minneapolis, MN 55440, pro se plaintiff.


ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Dana D Jackson, General Delivery, Minneapolis, MN 55440, pro se plaintiff.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Katherine Menendez dated December 16, 2019. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.

Based on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction over Defendants.

2. The Complaint not be transferred to another District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.

3. Ms. Jackson's Motion to Request Service on All Defendants, ECF No. 5, and Motion to Request Service on All Defendants, ECF No. 6, are DENIED as moot.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: January 31, 2020
at Minneapolis, Minnesota

s/John R. Tunheim

JOHN R. TUNHEIM

Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Jackson v. White

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jan 31, 2020
Civil No. 19-2332 (JRT/KMM) (D. Minn. Jan. 31, 2020)
Case details for

Jackson v. White

Case Details

Full title:DANA D. JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. JUDGE MAXINE WHITE, et al, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Jan 31, 2020

Citations

Civil No. 19-2332 (JRT/KMM) (D. Minn. Jan. 31, 2020)