In Jackson v. Thurman, 6 Johns. 322, the question was, whether B and C, children of the intestate's deceased sister, and D, son of the intestate's deceased brother, took per stirpes or per capita.
Summary of this case from Nichols v. ShepardNo. 2010201.
January 24, 2003.
Decision without published opinion. Rehearing denied.
In Jackson v. Thurman, 6 Johns. 322, the question was, whether B and C, children of the intestate's deceased sister, and D, son of the intestate's deceased brother, took per stirpes or per capita.
Summary of this case from Nichols v. ShepardFull title:KAY EHL JACKSON ET AL. v. SHIRLEY J. THURMAN, AS ANCILLARY ADM'X OF THE…
Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Date published: Jan 24, 2003
Shaw, C. J., said, — "It is a plain rule of law, that those who take property as a class of persons…
Matter of McKeonThe words "per stirpes," as stated above, were included in the sixth line of subdivision 6, effective…