Opinion
[No. 177, September Term, 1964.]
Decided March 4, 1965.
CRIMINAL LAW — Robbery With A Deadly Weapon — Assault — Evidence Sufficient To Sustain Convictions. p. 653
SENTENCE — Not Reviewable If Within Limits Permitted By Law. p. 653
S.K.S.
Decided March 4, 1965.
Appeal from the Criminal Court of Baltimore (HARRIS, J.).
Edward A. Jackson was convicted of robbery with a deadly weapon and of assault by the trial court, sitting without a jury, and from the judgments entered thereon, he appeals.
Affirmed.
The cause was argued before PRESCOTT, C.J., and HAMMOND, MARBURY, SYBERT and BARNES, JJ.
John R. Hargrove, with whom were Howard Hargrove on the brief, for appellant.
John A. Blondell, Special Attorney, with whom were Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General, Charles E. Moylan, Jr. and Edward G. Wyatt, State's Attorney and Assistant State's Attorney, respectively, for Baltimore City, on the brief, for appellee.
On this appeal the appellant contends that the evidence presented was insufficient to support his convictions in a non-jury trial on separate charges of robbery with a deadly weapon and of assault, and that his two consecutive sentences of seven and one-half years each were excessive.
We have reviewed the evidence and find that it was ample to warrant the convictions. The sentences were within the limits permitted by law and thus are not reviewable by us.
Judgments affirmed.