From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 4, 1922
92 So. 909 (Ala. Crim. App. 1922)

Opinion

8 Div. 838.

April 4, 1922.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Madison County; Robert C. Brickell, Judge.

A.W. Jackson was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals. Reversed and remanded.

The second count of the indictment charges, that after September 30, 1919, the defendant, whose Christian name is to the grand jury unknown, did have in his possession a still apparatus appliance, or device or substitute therefor, to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited liquors, etc.

R.E. Smith, of Huntsville, for appellant.

The verdict, having specified the second count, was an acquittal under the first count. 15 Ala. App. 180, 72 So. 757; 91 Ala, 32, 10 So. 30. Penal acts do not take effect until 60 days after approval, unless specially provided for by the act. Section 7805, Code 1907. The second count was therefore a nullity, and will not support the judgment. 17 Ala. App. 464, 86 So. 172; 17 Ala. App. 504, 86 So. 175; 159 Ala. 71, 48 So. 864, 133 Am. St. Rep. 20; section 7139, Code 1907.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.

Brief of counsel did not reach the Reporter.


The indictment contained two counts. Count 1 charged the defendant with distilling, making, or manufacturing prohibited liquors, naming them. The second count, omitting the formal parts, charged that after September 30, 1919, he did have in his possession a still, apparatus, etc., to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited liquors. The verdict of the jury was, "We, the jury, find the defendant guilty as charged in the second count." The judgement of the court followed this verdict. The defendant having been tried under an indictment containing two counts, and found guilty as to the second count only, the verdict of the jury operated as an acquittal of the charge contained in the first count.

Count 2 under which this defendant was convicted, is bad, and will not support the judgment of conviction based thereon. This identical question has been decided in Clark v. State, ante, p. 217, 90 So. 16.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Jackson v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 4, 1922
92 So. 909 (Ala. Crim. App. 1922)
Case details for

Jackson v. State

Case Details

Full title:JACKSON v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Apr 4, 1922

Citations

92 So. 909 (Ala. Crim. App. 1922)
18 Ala. App. 422

Citing Cases

Dean v. State

Code 1923, §§ 4534, 4928. Prior to passage of the Act of 1927 (Gen.Acts 1927, p. 554) the facts alleged did…