Jackson v. Ponce

Full title: CLIFTON JAMES JACKSON, Petitioner, v. PONCE, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 10, 2015

2:15-cv-1700 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 10, 2015)

Opinion

CLIFTON JAMES JACKSON, Petitioner, v. PONCE, Warden, Respondent. No. 2:15-cv-1700 GGH P United States District Court, E.D. California. September 10, 2015

          ORDER

          GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge.

         Petitioner has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, and paid the requisite filing fee. Since petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondent will be directed to file an answer or a motion to dismiss.

         In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. Respondent is directed to file an answer or a motion to dismiss within sixty (60) days from the date of this order. If an answer is filed, respondent shall include with the answer any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the application.

         2. Petitioner's traverse, if any, is due on or before thirty (30) days from the date respondent's answer is filed; an opposition to a motion to dismiss is due within thirty days of service of the motion to dismiss.