From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Gorton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Nov 19, 2020
No. 3:19-cv-00427-YY (D. Or. Nov. 19, 2020)

Opinion

No. 3:19-cv-00427-YY

11-19-2020

BRYCE JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. CATHY GORTON and GREG MANSOFF, Defendants.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge You issued a Findings and Recommendation [80] on April 23, 2020, in which she recommends that the Court deny Defendants' motion for summary judgment. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge You's Findings and Recommendation [80]. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [47] is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 19, 2020.

/s/_________

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Jackson v. Gorton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Nov 19, 2020
No. 3:19-cv-00427-YY (D. Or. Nov. 19, 2020)
Case details for

Jackson v. Gorton

Case Details

Full title:BRYCE JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. CATHY GORTON and GREG MANSOFF, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Nov 19, 2020

Citations

No. 3:19-cv-00427-YY (D. Or. Nov. 19, 2020)

Citing Cases

Monical v. Marion Cnty.

Id. at 1168; see alsoJackson v.Gorton, No. 3:19-cv-00427-YY, 2020 WL 6832066, at *4 (D. Or. Apr. 23, 2020),…