From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 27, 2008
49 A.D.3d 1092 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 501989.

March 27, 2008.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Carl Jackson, Pine City, petitioner pro se. Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ.


Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier II disciplinary determination finding him guilty of disobeying a direct order. Having reviewed the record, we must annul.

The misbehavior report, as amplified by the hearing testimony, reveals that the conduct underlying the charge was petitioner's failure to respond to the industry superintendent when he twice asked petitioner why he was standing by the vocational gate. Given that the superintendent merely asked petitioner a question and never actually gave him any directive, we cannot conclude that substantial evidence supports the finding that petitioner disobeyed a direct order ( see 7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [7] [i]; see also Matter of Cliff v Vaughn, 275 AD2d 871, 871-872; Matter of Covington v Coombe, 262 AD2d 675, 676). Our disposition herein has rendered petitioner's remaining contentions academic.

Adjudged that the determination is annulled, without costs, petition granted and the Commissioner of Correctional Services is directed to expunge all references to this matter from petitioner's institutional record.


Summaries of

Jackson v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 27, 2008
49 A.D.3d 1092 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Jackson v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CARL JACKSON, Petitioner, v. W.D. BROWN, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 27, 2008

Citations

49 A.D.3d 1092 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 2703
853 N.Y.S.2d 730

Citing Cases

In re Tafari

The determination should be annulled. The misbehavior report, upon which the Hearing Officer based his…