From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson Terrace v. Patterson

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jan 4, 1994
159 Misc. 2d 637 (N.Y. App. Term 1994)

Opinion

January 4, 1994

Appeal from the Nassau County District Court, Robert F. Dolan, J.

Michael A. Fiechter, North Bellmore, for appellant.

Bloom Sperber, Mineola, for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

Appeal dismissed.

In this proceeding pursuant to RPAPL 711 (5), it appears that tenant made an oral application to dismiss based upon landlord's failure to serve a termination notice. Neither the application nor the facts supporting it appear in the record. Based on the application, the court wrote a decision purporting to grant the application and to dismiss the petition.

In our view, the appeal must be dismissed because no appeal lies from a decision (see, 10 Carmody-Wait 2d, N Y Prac § 70:8). Even if an applicable order (CPLR 2219 [a]) or judgment had been entered, effective appellate review would be impossible in light of the failure to spread the facts justifying the application upon the record. In the event the application was based on the lack of a termination notice, it is noted that this court held in Jackson Terrace Assocs. v Howard (NYLJ, Apr. 7, 1993, at 26, col 2 [App Term, 9th 10th Jud Dists]) that such a notice is not required in a proceeding brought pursuant to RPAPL 711 (5), which is not predicated on a termination of the tenancy.

We further note that no appeal has been taken from the vacatur of tenant's default.

DiPAOLA, P.J., INGRASSIA and LUCIANO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jackson Terrace v. Patterson

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jan 4, 1994
159 Misc. 2d 637 (N.Y. App. Term 1994)
Case details for

Jackson Terrace v. Patterson

Case Details

Full title:JACKSON TERRACE ASSOCIATES, Appellant, v. SYLVIA A. PATTERSON, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Jan 4, 1994

Citations

159 Misc. 2d 637 (N.Y. App. Term 1994)
611 N.Y.S.2d 430

Citing Cases

Hudsonview Co. v. Jenkins

Even in a RPAPL 711 (5) or 715 (1) proceeding, where a notice of termination would not otherwise be required,…

Gur Assoc. v. Convenience on Eight Corp.

"[A] termination notice is not generally required to maintain an illegal use proceeding, since such a…